Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of your parties, arising out of your over marriage from the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more
A reduce court might not rule against a binding precedent, even if it feels that it's unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. In the event the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the law evolve, it may either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of your boy or Female will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they might Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based over the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a move to some higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, supplies financial relief by inserting an employee in a higher fork out scale, without switching their occupation duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained inside the same pay scale for a protracted time, particularly when they lack options for promotion. Upgradation is often a policy Device used to ease the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been arrived at, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically produce exoneration from departmental charges based around the same factual grounds. Even though a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it's generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't convince the department of his/her innocence.
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name around the ECL based to the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It's also a effectively-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is often a mandatory need in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation needs that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set from the government.
Summaries of cases that form the lives of young individuals, ensuring a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and lovers alike.
8. For your reasons stated above, this court finds the petition to get without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend while in the comments, and their request is As a company law cases uk result acceded to. All pending applications, if any, are dismissed. Read more
The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, except for most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Furthermore, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it has issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.